Following my review of the DCEU installment of Wonder Woman, I have seen many memes and forum discussions around the impact of the Wonder Woman movie and it’s true purpose. I will state this outright, it was not meant to be a figurehead for feminism or a statement about female led superhero movies; I’m not saying it didn’t become those things, but that was not its true purpose. You may agree with me and you may not, but hear me out first.
Alright, now let’s start off by saying that I loved Wonder Woman. I think it was a great addition to the DCEU and it should have been the movie that they used to kick off their universe. Obviously as a comic fan there were some nit picky things that I wasn’t a fan of, and Dr. Poison was a sore spot for me personally. Putting those things aside, Wonder Woman showed everyone how great a superhero movie could be done, not just a female led superhero movie, but all superhero movies. Also, I do need to clarify something, in my review of Wonder Woman I said it was the first female led superhero movie and I have come to learn that was a false statement to make. While Elektra and Catwoman are technically anti-heroes/villains their ventures onto the big screen came well before Wonder Woman, and the Supergirl movie from the 80’s trumped all of them by a couple decades. Most will look past these movies because of how poorly they were received by both critics and fans alike, but their contributions to female led comic book movies cannot go unnoticed. Now that I have cleared that up, time to move on to the reason behind the modern adaptation of Merciful Minerva.
Money. It all comes down to money. Looking at the top 20 titles from August 2016, you will see what I mean.
There is no doubt that DC’s Rebirth has won them the market in comic sales, but looking at the listed DC titles you can see of their announced 20 movies, you will see 9 of them on the top sales chart (some can be argued for tie ins making the number jump to 14). Now of those top 9 sellers by DC you will notice 3 exclusive female titles: Wonder Woman, Bat Girl and the Birds of Prey and a Batgirl solo series. Coincidentally DC comics just announced (within the last 6 months) a Birds of Prey movie (ft. Harley Quinn) and a Batgirl movie (to be helmed by Joss Whedon). The reason these movies got the green light was (partly) due to the success of Wonder Woman, but it was mostly to capitalize on their comic sales. DC realized that they could capitalize on popularity of sales by adapting movies of their top sellers. Marvel did the same thing with a few notable exceptions (GotG being the prime example), but Marvel’s problem is that apart from being core members of the Avengers (or assorted other teams) they don’t have many singular female heroes. Their most notable female hero is Captain Marvel who is getting her own solo movie starring Brie Larson. Fans have been lobbying for a Black Widow solo film since her first introduction in Iron Man 2, which recently had been confirmed to be in the works. The sad thing is that most studios don’t care about equality, they care about what will make them a butt load of money and right now… that would be comic book movies. Even if you put the revenue aspect of her film aside the main reason Wonder Woman got her own solo outing was due to her impact, not her impact as the first successful female led superhero movie, but her impact on their overall narrative.
DC comics has been building their expanded universe ever since the release of Man of Steel back in 2013. Since then, there have been 3 additions to their universe: Batman V. Superman, Suicide Squad and Wonder Woman. Of the 4 movies released in their extended universe, 3 of them contained the Trinity. Superman got his solo movie, (I call Batman V. Superman a Batman film with a glorified Superman cameo), and finally a Wonder Woman film. These three represent the founding pillars of DC comics. They are the core of the Justice League and main DC continuity as a whole. For all their idiotic ideas (again… Jesse Eisenberg as Lex Luthor?!) the execs at DC knew they could not release a Justice League movie without giving the Trinity their own solo films first. That right there, is the main reason Wonder Woman was finally given her own movie, because of the impact she has on the Justice League and the overall narrative that DC is trying to tell with their expanded universe.
Now again I will say, I loved the movie, but most people need to understand why it was made instead of parroting back what they see on the internet. Is she a strong female character? The strongest. Is she a symbol for the empowerment of women? She is brighter than the damn sun in that regard. Did she show that female led comic book movies should be given a chance? You’re damn right she did. But before jumping on the social justice bandwagon and defending a movie that you might not have seen yet solely because it is the first successful female led comic book movie is fairly off-putting.
Finally I will end on this, I think that more female led comic book movies should be made; however, using the success of one movie (with arguably THE most popular female comic book character in the world) to justify making more female led movies just because you want female led movies is irritating. Instead of grilling studios and their choices for movies speak the language that they do, money. Buy more solo female led comic books, buy more female comic paraphernalia, buy more clothing featuring female superheroes. When you buy merchandise you show the studios that people care for the characters and they will be more likely to give a big budget movie a chance. If we all contribute to increasing female comic book profits, then maybe, just maybe we’ll start to see more equality in comic book movies.